<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Staffing &#8211; Employees vs. Independent Contractors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robhyndman.com/2009/11/30/staffing-employees-vs-independent-contractors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2009/11/30/staffing-employees-vs-independent-contractors/</link>
	<description>any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:32:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Hyndman</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2009/11/30/staffing-employees-vs-independent-contractors/comment-page-1/#comment-85822</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Hyndman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 21:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/?p=2978#comment-85822</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Mark - much appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Mark &#8211; much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark MacLeod</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2009/11/30/staffing-employees-vs-independent-contractors/comment-page-1/#comment-85820</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark MacLeod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/?p=2978#comment-85820</guid>
		<description>Hey there, since my old post has come up a couple of times, here is a new link to it. The old link does not work anymore 
http://www.startupcfo.ca/?p=409</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there, since my old post has come up a couple of times, here is a new link to it. The old link does not work anymore<br />
<a href="http://www.startupcfo.ca/?p=409" rel="nofollow">http://www.startupcfo.ca/?p=409</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spencer Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2009/11/30/staffing-employees-vs-independent-contractors/comment-page-1/#comment-85816</link>
		<dc:creator>Spencer Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/?p=2978#comment-85816</guid>
		<description>An excellent article outlining the difference between the two roles.  I found it especially interesting the difference between hiring an employee vs a contractor with implications to SRED.  This article  http://www.startupcfo.ca/2009/11/top-finance-mistakes.html is excellent.\

Keep up the good work</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An excellent article outlining the difference between the two roles.  I found it especially interesting the difference between hiring an employee vs a contractor with implications to SRED.  This article  <a href="http://www.startupcfo.ca/2009/11/top-finance-mistakes.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.startupcfo.ca/2009/11/top-finance-mistakes.html</a> is excellent.\</p>
<p>Keep up the good work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2009/11/30/staffing-employees-vs-independent-contractors/comment-page-1/#comment-85803</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 02:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/?p=2978#comment-85803</guid>
		<description>Rob,

Employers face the similar issues in the States.  The IRS has a list of 20 criteria that should be met in order to be Ïndependent Contractor. So if you hire a Ïndependent the employer should due to due diligence to avoid being responsible for back taxes if IRS determines they should have been a an employee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob,</p>
<p>Employers face the similar issues in the States.  The IRS has a list of 20 criteria that should be met in order to be Ïndependent Contractor. So if you hire a Ïndependent the employer should due to due diligence to avoid being responsible for back taxes if IRS determines they should have been a an employee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Hyndman</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2009/11/30/staffing-employees-vs-independent-contractors/comment-page-1/#comment-85798</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Hyndman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/?p=2978#comment-85798</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment, Greg!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment, Greg!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Boutin</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2009/11/30/staffing-employees-vs-independent-contractors/comment-page-1/#comment-85797</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Boutin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/?p=2978#comment-85797</guid>
		<description>Good post, Rob.

I don&#039;t know if you wrote that after seeing the discussion I started on Mark&#039;s post, but I would refer your readers to it for a more philosophical perspective on this, as well as additional practical information (e.g. work-for-hire considerations): http://www.startupcfo.ca/2009/11/top-finance-mistakes.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, Rob.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if you wrote that after seeing the discussion I started on Mark&#8217;s post, but I would refer your readers to it for a more philosophical perspective on this, as well as additional practical information (e.g. work-for-hire considerations): <a href="http://www.startupcfo.ca/2009/11/top-finance-mistakes.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.startupcfo.ca/2009/11/top-finance-mistakes.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

