<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Why There Aren&#8217;t More Googles&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robhyndman.com/2008/04/16/why-there-arent-more-googles/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2008/04/16/why-there-arent-more-googles/</link>
	<description>any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 04:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Federman</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2008/04/16/why-there-arent-more-googles/#comment-80228</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Federman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/?p=2699#comment-80228</guid>
		<description>And the simple reason for this, besides the BAH (Bureaucratic, Administrative, Hierarchical) mentality is the BAH analysis that they've all been taught in their MBA classes, that fundamentally misses the point of the UCaPP (Ubiquitously Connected and Pervasively Proximate) world: It's not what the thing (the company, invention, etc.) &lt;em&gt;does&lt;/em&gt;, it's the effects and changes that it creates in the environment of human interactions that matters. 

Google was successful not simply because it was a better search engine, but because Page and Brin either fundamentally understood the effects of a collaboratively indexed search engine, or just got lucky that their algorithm happened to align well with those effects. Either way, this is a type of analysis that MBA schools cannot recognize (because of their Industrial Age roots), and so therefore, neither can VCs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the simple reason for this, besides the BAH (Bureaucratic, Administrative, Hierarchical) mentality is the BAH analysis that they&#8217;ve all been taught in their MBA classes, that fundamentally misses the point of the UCaPP (Ubiquitously Connected and Pervasively Proximate) world: It&#8217;s not what the thing (the company, invention, etc.) <em>does</em>, it&#8217;s the effects and changes that it creates in the environment of human interactions that matters. </p>
<p>Google was successful not simply because it was a better search engine, but because Page and Brin either fundamentally understood the effects of a collaboratively indexed search engine, or just got lucky that their algorithm happened to align well with those effects. Either way, this is a type of analysis that MBA schools cannot recognize (because of their Industrial Age roots), and so therefore, neither can VCs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.470 seconds -->
