<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: They Even Charged Me For The Stamp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/10/26/they-even-charged-me-for-the-stamp/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/10/26/they-even-charged-me-for-the-stamp/</link>
	<description>any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob Hyndman</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/10/26/they-even-charged-me-for-the-stamp/#comment-79691</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Hyndman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 15:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/10/26/they-even-charged-me-for-the-stamp/#comment-79691</guid>
		<description>That fee drives me bonkers.  Oligopoly fee, AFAIC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That fee drives me bonkers.  Oligopoly fee, AFAIC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart MacDonald</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/10/26/they-even-charged-me-for-the-stamp/#comment-79690</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart MacDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/10/26/they-even-charged-me-for-the-stamp/#comment-79690</guid>
		<description>I agree with the irksome nature of charging for the stamp, Rob, but to your profession's credit it's not the worst of this type of thing - which is sad commentary.

One that really bothers me, in the Toronto area at least, is the 407 ETR Toll Highway. Never mind charging for the stamp, they charge for the whole invoice, as well as a lovely "no transponder" fee. Using the thing for one exit will cost you around $5.90 - never mind that the fee for the service itself (that is the simple per KM cost of using the road) is at most $0.176/KM.

That's - wait for it - the *definition* of highway robbery.

Then, there are the "system access fees" that wireless providers charge in Canada. These are about $7/month and are for *nothing more than the cost of the carrier doing business*. People think that they are a tax, or Government fee or something. Nope. It's just revenue, carved out to make the sell price look lower.

I could go on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the irksome nature of charging for the stamp, Rob, but to your profession&#8217;s credit it&#8217;s not the worst of this type of thing - which is sad commentary.</p>
<p>One that really bothers me, in the Toronto area at least, is the 407 ETR Toll Highway. Never mind charging for the stamp, they charge for the whole invoice, as well as a lovely &#8220;no transponder&#8221; fee. Using the thing for one exit will cost you around $5.90 - never mind that the fee for the service itself (that is the simple per KM cost of using the road) is at most $0.176/KM.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s - wait for it - the *definition* of highway robbery.</p>
<p>Then, there are the &#8220;system access fees&#8221; that wireless providers charge in Canada. These are about $7/month and are for *nothing more than the cost of the carrier doing business*. People think that they are a tax, or Government fee or something. Nope. It&#8217;s just revenue, carved out to make the sell price look lower.</p>
<p>I could go on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael webste</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/10/26/they-even-charged-me-for-the-stamp/#comment-79688</link>
		<dc:creator>michael webste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/10/26/they-even-charged-me-for-the-stamp/#comment-79688</guid>
		<description>Rob;  Good for you.  Too bad more clients don't demand our billing scheme.  Clients pay enough money for legal services, they don't need to pay for the freight.

Jason; Agree with you entirely.  But few legal consumers look at it that way.  Maybe I should start blogging about it more?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob;  Good for you.  Too bad more clients don&#8217;t demand our billing scheme.  Clients pay enough money for legal services, they don&#8217;t need to pay for the freight.</p>
<p>Jason; Agree with you entirely.  But few legal consumers look at it that way.  Maybe I should start blogging about it more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Young</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/10/26/they-even-charged-me-for-the-stamp/#comment-79687</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/10/26/they-even-charged-me-for-the-stamp/#comment-79687</guid>
		<description>I don't understand the *business* argument for billing for a stamp. It makes you look like you bill for work over value. What client wants that to pay for that proposition?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand the *business* argument for billing for a stamp. It makes you look like you bill for work over value. What client wants that to pay for that proposition?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Hyndman</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/10/26/they-even-charged-me-for-the-stamp/#comment-79675</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Hyndman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 00:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/10/26/they-even-charged-me-for-the-stamp/#comment-79675</guid>
		<description>I do the same thing, Michael.  It seems the right thing to do.  And clients really seem to hate being chanrged for operating overhead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do the same thing, Michael.  It seems the right thing to do.  And clients really seem to hate being chanrged for operating overhead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael webster</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/10/26/they-even-charged-me-for-the-stamp/#comment-79673</link>
		<dc:creator>michael webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 22:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/10/26/they-even-charged-me-for-the-stamp/#comment-79673</guid>
		<description>For the last seven years, I have only billed real third party bills as disbursments.  No stamps, phone calls, faxes, photocopying -unless supported by invoice by Kinko's or the like, or anything else.  Clients pay for my legal services and not my operating costs.

The sad thing is that the Law Society allows this nonsense about billing for operating costs to continue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the last seven years, I have only billed real third party bills as disbursments.  No stamps, phone calls, faxes, photocopying -unless supported by invoice by Kinko&#8217;s or the like, or anything else.  Clients pay for my legal services and not my operating costs.</p>
<p>The sad thing is that the Law Society allows this nonsense about billing for operating costs to continue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Young</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/10/26/they-even-charged-me-for-the-stamp/#comment-79671</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 22:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/10/26/they-even-charged-me-for-the-stamp/#comment-79671</guid>
		<description>Does it speak to greediness or poor marketing? I'm biased, but I think it's the latter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it speak to greediness or poor marketing? I&#8217;m biased, but I think it&#8217;s the latter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Student</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/10/26/they-even-charged-me-for-the-stamp/#comment-79670</link>
		<dc:creator>Student</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/10/26/they-even-charged-me-for-the-stamp/#comment-79670</guid>
		<description>As a law student, the recent flood of negative press and comments about my future profession is disheartening and concerning. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a law student, the recent flood of negative press and comments about my future profession is disheartening and concerning. :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seva</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/10/26/they-even-charged-me-for-the-stamp/#comment-79669</link>
		<dc:creator>seva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/10/26/they-even-charged-me-for-the-stamp/#comment-79669</guid>
		<description>alas, and sadly, I fully agree. Although $0.50/page photocopying is even worse. I heard of a client, plaintiff in a wrongful dismissal suit, telling his lawyer that he'd gladly go to Kinkos and do his own photocopying at $0.02/page and then bring the results back to the lawyer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>alas, and sadly, I fully agree. Although $0.50/page photocopying is even worse. I heard of a client, plaintiff in a wrongful dismissal suit, telling his lawyer that he&#8217;d gladly go to Kinkos and do his own photocopying at $0.02/page and then bring the results back to the lawyer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
