<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;People Ready&#8221; Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/</link>
	<description>any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:33:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-79410</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 17:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/#comment-79410</guid>
		<description>unbiased has nothing to do with this. unpaid-for does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>unbiased has nothing to do with this. unpaid-for does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robhyndman.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; "Board of Business Titans"</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-79409</link>
		<dc:creator>robhyndman.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; "Board of Business Titans"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 16:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/#comment-79409</guid>
		<description>[...] Hyndman &#124; Law      &#171; Previous Post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hyndman | Law      &laquo; Previous Post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No, it&#8217;s not really a &#8220;conversation&#8221; &#187; mathewingram.com/media</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-79408</link>
		<dc:creator>No, it&#8217;s not really a &#8220;conversation&#8221; &#187; mathewingram.com/media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 16:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/#comment-79408</guid>
		<description>[...] in new media. Fred and Paul have slightly different roles to play, as my friend Rob Hyndman notes in his post on the subject, and therefore different considerations to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in new media. Fred and Paul have slightly different roles to play, as my friend Rob Hyndman notes in his post on the subject, and therefore different considerations to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Hyndman</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-79407</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Hyndman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 16:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/#comment-79407</guid>
		<description>Joe: I think a  lot of folks will probably focus on that, largely because Mike&#039;s been so vocal in his opposition to Pay Per Post.  Another potential bias issue: that it&#039;s Valleywag, which competes with Mike and Om for scoops, that is the media outlet taking a shot at them over this.  Not sure how to read that one.

Fred: LOL.  Just kidding you on the &#039;wrong&#039; thing. I miss that discussion too. Though until the case settles or is decided, I think the conversation has moved on to implementation, etc.  By the time it&#039;s over, so too will YouTube&#039;s halcyon days, perhaps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe: I think a  lot of folks will probably focus on that, largely because Mike&#8217;s been so vocal in his opposition to Pay Per Post.  Another potential bias issue: that it&#8217;s Valleywag, which competes with Mike and Om for scoops, that is the media outlet taking a shot at them over this.  Not sure how to read that one.</p>
<p>Fred: LOL.  Just kidding you on the &#8216;wrong&#8217; thing. I miss that discussion too. Though until the case settles or is decided, I think the conversation has moved on to implementation, etc.  By the time it&#8217;s over, so too will YouTube&#8217;s halcyon days, perhaps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No, it&#8217;s not really a &#8220;conversation&#8221; &#187; mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-79406</link>
		<dc:creator>No, it&#8217;s not really a &#8220;conversation&#8221; &#187; mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 15:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/#comment-79406</guid>
		<description>[...] in new media. Fred and Paul have slightly different roles to play, as my friend Rob Hyndman notes in his post on the subject, and therefore different considerations to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in new media. Fred and Paul have slightly different roles to play, as my friend Rob Hyndman notes in his post on the subject, and therefore different considerations to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-79405</link>
		<dc:creator>fred wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 15:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/#comment-79405</guid>
		<description>hi rob,

what part of the youtube/google thing was i wrong about?

i really miss that debate.

maybe we should get it going again!

fred</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi rob,</p>
<p>what part of the youtube/google thing was i wrong about?</p>
<p>i really miss that debate.</p>
<p>maybe we should get it going again!</p>
<p>fred</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Duck</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-79404</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Duck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 14:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/#comment-79404</guid>
		<description>Credibility is an issue here, but my main beef is hypocrisy.  Of course advertising will distort our conversations, but I&#039;ve read these guys suggest how important it is not to let that happen, and here they are letting it happen and cashing in.   And I&#039;m supposed to believe them when they suggest that Grandma Sally&#039;s silly Pay Per Posts will ruin the blogosphere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Credibility is an issue here, but my main beef is hypocrisy.  Of course advertising will distort our conversations, but I&#8217;ve read these guys suggest how important it is not to let that happen, and here they are letting it happen and cashing in.   And I&#8217;m supposed to believe them when they suggest that Grandma Sally&#8217;s silly Pay Per Posts will ruin the blogosphere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
