<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;People Ready&#8221; Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/</link>
	<description>any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/#comment-79410</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 17:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/#comment-79410</guid>
		<description>unbiased has nothing to do with this. unpaid-for does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>unbiased has nothing to do with this. unpaid-for does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robhyndman.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; "Board of Business Titans"</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/#comment-79409</link>
		<dc:creator>robhyndman.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; "Board of Business Titans"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 16:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/#comment-79409</guid>
		<description>[...] Hyndman &#124; Law      &#171; Previous Post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hyndman | Law      &laquo; Previous Post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No, it&#8217;s not really a &#8220;conversation&#8221; &#187; mathewingram.com/media</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/#comment-79408</link>
		<dc:creator>No, it&#8217;s not really a &#8220;conversation&#8221; &#187; mathewingram.com/media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 16:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/#comment-79408</guid>
		<description>[...] in new media. Fred and Paul have slightly different roles to play, as my friend Rob Hyndman notes in his post on the subject, and therefore different considerations to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in new media. Fred and Paul have slightly different roles to play, as my friend Rob Hyndman notes in his post on the subject, and therefore different considerations to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Hyndman</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/#comment-79407</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Hyndman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 16:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/#comment-79407</guid>
		<description>Joe: I think a  lot of folks will probably focus on that, largely because Mike's been so vocal in his opposition to Pay Per Post.  Another potential bias issue: that it's Valleywag, which competes with Mike and Om for scoops, that is the media outlet taking a shot at them over this.  Not sure how to read that one.

Fred: LOL.  Just kidding you on the 'wrong' thing. I miss that discussion too. Though until the case settles or is decided, I think the conversation has moved on to implementation, etc.  By the time it's over, so too will YouTube's halcyon days, perhaps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe: I think a  lot of folks will probably focus on that, largely because Mike&#8217;s been so vocal in his opposition to Pay Per Post.  Another potential bias issue: that it&#8217;s Valleywag, which competes with Mike and Om for scoops, that is the media outlet taking a shot at them over this.  Not sure how to read that one.</p>
<p>Fred: LOL.  Just kidding you on the &#8216;wrong&#8217; thing. I miss that discussion too. Though until the case settles or is decided, I think the conversation has moved on to implementation, etc.  By the time it&#8217;s over, so too will YouTube&#8217;s halcyon days, perhaps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No, it&#8217;s not really a &#8220;conversation&#8221; &#187; mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/#comment-79406</link>
		<dc:creator>No, it&#8217;s not really a &#8220;conversation&#8221; &#187; mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 15:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/#comment-79406</guid>
		<description>[...] in new media. Fred and Paul have slightly different roles to play, as my friend Rob Hyndman notes in his post on the subject, and therefore different considerations to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in new media. Fred and Paul have slightly different roles to play, as my friend Rob Hyndman notes in his post on the subject, and therefore different considerations to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/#comment-79405</link>
		<dc:creator>fred wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 15:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/#comment-79405</guid>
		<description>hi rob,

what part of the youtube/google thing was i wrong about?

i really miss that debate.

maybe we should get it going again!

fred</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi rob,</p>
<p>what part of the youtube/google thing was i wrong about?</p>
<p>i really miss that debate.</p>
<p>maybe we should get it going again!</p>
<p>fred</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Duck</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/#comment-79404</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Duck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 14:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/06/23/people-ready-blogging/#comment-79404</guid>
		<description>Credibility is an issue here, but my main beef is hypocrisy.  Of course advertising will distort our conversations, but I've read these guys suggest how important it is not to let that happen, and here they are letting it happen and cashing in.   And I'm supposed to believe them when they suggest that Grandma Sally's silly Pay Per Posts will ruin the blogosphere?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Credibility is an issue here, but my main beef is hypocrisy.  Of course advertising will distort our conversations, but I&#8217;ve read these guys suggest how important it is not to let that happen, and here they are letting it happen and cashing in.   And I&#8217;m supposed to believe them when they suggest that Grandma Sally&#8217;s silly Pay Per Posts will ruin the blogosphere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.615 seconds -->
