<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s Not the Narcissism, it&#8217;s about People Like Us</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/02/26/its-not-the-narcissism-its-about-people-like-us/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/02/26/its-not-the-narcissism-its-about-people-like-us/</link>
	<description>any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: robhyndman.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is Social Media Changing the Way We Think About Celebrity?</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/02/26/its-not-the-narcissism-its-about-people-like-us/#comment-79562</link>
		<dc:creator>robhyndman.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is Social Media Changing the Way We Think About Celebrity?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 12:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/02/26/its-not-the-narcissism-its-about-people-like-us/#comment-79562</guid>
		<description>[...] months ago I wrote about the idea of digital narcissism, and my opinion that the lure of social media wasn&#8217;t the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] months ago I wrote about the idea of digital narcissism, and my opinion that the lure of social media wasn&#8217;t the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robhyndman.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Media feeds our internal lives and our relationships with other people</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/02/26/its-not-the-narcissism-its-about-people-like-us/#comment-53255</link>
		<dc:creator>robhyndman.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Media feeds our internal lives and our relationships with other people</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 12:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/02/26/its-not-the-narcissism-its-about-people-like-us/#comment-53255</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m beginning to believe that Hollywood has simply lost touch, at a fundamental level, with its customers, and that the declining relevance (though viewership was slightly up this year) of the Oscars is yet another signal of this. I wrote about this a couple of days ago but the thought has stuck with me as Oscar reviews come in. It has seemed to me that we want deeper engagement with media - that we are looking for ways to make it more relevant to our lives and to derive deeper meaning from it, but that BigMedia simply isn&#8217;t filling that need, stuck as it is in old business models. And so I was fascinated to stumble upon, via Mathew, a piece by Steve Bryant  at The Hollywood Reporter, who really ought to win a prize for capturing this idea in language that will undoubtedly be much linked to over the next few days: Media is changing from entertainment into utility. Media that can&#8217;t be manipulated is almost useless. When I listen to NPR, I wish I could freeze the broadcast and pull a link from the radio, send it to a friend. When I watch TV, same thing. When I go to the movies, same thing. But I can&#8217;t. I can only do that online. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m beginning to believe that Hollywood has simply lost touch, at a fundamental level, with its customers, and that the declining relevance (though viewership was slightly up this year) of the Oscars is yet another signal of this. I wrote about this a couple of days ago but the thought has stuck with me as Oscar reviews come in. It has seemed to me that we want deeper engagement with media - that we are looking for ways to make it more relevant to our lives and to derive deeper meaning from it, but that BigMedia simply isn&#8217;t filling that need, stuck as it is in old business models. And so I was fascinated to stumble upon, via Mathew, a piece by Steve Bryant  at The Hollywood Reporter, who really ought to win a prize for capturing this idea in language that will undoubtedly be much linked to over the next few days: Media is changing from entertainment into utility. Media that can&#8217;t be manipulated is almost useless. When I listen to NPR, I wish I could freeze the broadcast and pull a link from the radio, send it to a friend. When I watch TV, same thing. When I go to the movies, same thing. But I can&#8217;t. I can only do that online. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
