<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Macleans&#8217; Secret Weapon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/31/macleans-secret-weapon/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/31/macleans-secret-weapon/</link>
	<description>any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob Hyndman</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/31/macleans-secret-weapon/#comment-47522</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Hyndman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/31/macleans-secret-weapon/#comment-47522</guid>
		<description>Well, I think there's a lot of what you're looking for out there already, Mose.  It's not hard to find.  And I certainly agree that Scott's not his most interesting when he's writing ET-type content, but I still enjoy his sense of humour, and think we need more of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I think there&#8217;s a lot of what you&#8217;re looking for out there already, Mose.  It&#8217;s not hard to find.  And I certainly agree that Scott&#8217;s not his most interesting when he&#8217;s writing ET-type content, but I still enjoy his sense of humour, and think we need more of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mose</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/31/macleans-secret-weapon/#comment-47508</link>
		<dc:creator>mose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 19:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/31/macleans-secret-weapon/#comment-47508</guid>
		<description>Ok. I am generally one to let things slide. But I just have to say something here First MacLean's was the magazine that had an issue devoted to how much the Internet sucked right? Anyway - that's really beside the point. Je digress ...

I went and subscribed to Scott's blog.

Ouch.

I believe it has been said many times - the more the Net is like TV the less we need it. His blog is like an electronic sign at an ADD conference.

Entertainment Tonight type crap is fine for the TV junkies with enough brain power and attention span to tap into a sentence - but shouldn't we be holding a higher standard online? Like,maybe a paragraph. or two. maybe something to let us read, digest and follow. Some insight?

Man. I don't need "Quotable Quotes" online. Save the soundbites for the media. They deserve them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok. I am generally one to let things slide. But I just have to say something here First MacLean&#8217;s was the magazine that had an issue devoted to how much the Internet sucked right? Anyway - that&#8217;s really beside the point. Je digress &#8230;</p>
<p>I went and subscribed to Scott&#8217;s blog.</p>
<p>Ouch.</p>
<p>I believe it has been said many times - the more the Net is like TV the less we need it. His blog is like an electronic sign at an ADD conference.</p>
<p>Entertainment Tonight type crap is fine for the TV junkies with enough brain power and attention span to tap into a sentence - but shouldn&#8217;t we be holding a higher standard online? Like,maybe a paragraph. or two. maybe something to let us read, digest and follow. Some insight?</p>
<p>Man. I don&#8217;t need &#8220;Quotable Quotes&#8221; online. Save the soundbites for the media. They deserve them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
