<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Verizon - iPhone News Yields Lots of Me Too Posts But Little Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/29/verizon-iphone-news-yields-lots-of-me-too-posts-but-little-analysis/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/29/verizon-iphone-news-yields-lots-of-me-too-posts-but-little-analysis/</link>
	<description>any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob Hyndman</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/29/verizon-iphone-news-yields-lots-of-me-too-posts-but-little-analysis/#comment-47521</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Hyndman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:41:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/29/verizon-iphone-news-yields-lots-of-me-too-posts-but-little-analysis/#comment-47521</guid>
		<description>Norman - great comment - thanks for leaving it.  You really ought to launch your own blog :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Norman - great comment - thanks for leaving it.  You really ought to launch your own blog :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norman Young</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/29/verizon-iphone-news-yields-lots-of-me-too-posts-but-little-analysis/#comment-47520</link>
		<dc:creator>Norman Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/29/verizon-iphone-news-yields-lots-of-me-too-posts-but-little-analysis/#comment-47520</guid>
		<description>I once queried an insider at a major mobile manufacturer about what was a trivial technical change to their product design, but which would bring an entire new realm of value to the end user. His response was, "We generally only implement changes that the carriers ask for." That was a light bulb moment.

In telecom, the carriers are barons in a monarchy.

Dr. Norman Lewis of France Telecom reveals in IT Conversations #1706 http://www.itconversations.com/shows/detail1706.html [How do I do format hyperlinks properly in yet another wiki?] that recovering the debt that the wireless carriers have incurred in buying spectrum and infrastructure would require every GSM subscriber, their spouses, their kids and their dogs to use GSM for six hours per day for the next thirty years.

In wireless, spectrum is the constrained resource, as arable land is an agricultural economy. 

Our governments saw spectrum auctions as a means to sell their debt to the pre-bubble, cash-rich, telecom operators. In effect, they exchanged their authority over a large piece of the commons for a one-time capital infusion. Now, instead of all citizens carrying their government's debt directly, wireless subscribers pay the that portion of the public debt through their monthly plans with their mobile barons.

Terminal manufacturers are to wireless operators as horse breeders are to barons. Yes, they play a role in the economy, but "clout" is hardly a word you could use to describe their influence. Their products are commodities.

In my view, Apple's introduction of any kind of phone is a gross error. I presume that they are following a similar strategy as what propelled the Mac to success in face of the staid International Business Machine's attempt at creating personal computers. However, the fundamentals are different. In the 1980's, Moore's Law had just put the constrained resource of computing on an exponential trajectory, upward, through the microprocessor. In Clayton Christsen's model of innovation, computing had large populations of unserved markets yet to conquer.

Wireless telephony today is in almost exactly the opposite situation. The constrained resource, in spectrum, is scarce and getting scarcer, while the markets for mobile synchronous voice are thoroughly served by multiple competitors. The form of the mobile terminal offers only incremental opportunities for innovation, as we see in the iPhone.

The Magna Carta conceded the Crown's divine authority. However, Britain remained a monarchy for many centuries more.

There is hope for liberation in wireless communication, but I believe that it will come about through a republic, separated from the mother land by a large body of metaphorical water. We can pick that topic up again in another conversation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I once queried an insider at a major mobile manufacturer about what was a trivial technical change to their product design, but which would bring an entire new realm of value to the end user. His response was, &#8220;We generally only implement changes that the carriers ask for.&#8221; That was a light bulb moment.</p>
<p>In telecom, the carriers are barons in a monarchy.</p>
<p>Dr. Norman Lewis of France Telecom reveals in IT Conversations #1706 <a href="http://www.itconversations.com/shows/detail1706.html" onClick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.itconversations.com');">http://www.itconversations.com/shows/detail1706.html</a> [How do I do format hyperlinks properly in yet another wiki?] that recovering the debt that the wireless carriers have incurred in buying spectrum and infrastructure would require every GSM subscriber, their spouses, their kids and their dogs to use GSM for six hours per day for the next thirty years.</p>
<p>In wireless, spectrum is the constrained resource, as arable land is an agricultural economy. </p>
<p>Our governments saw spectrum auctions as a means to sell their debt to the pre-bubble, cash-rich, telecom operators. In effect, they exchanged their authority over a large piece of the commons for a one-time capital infusion. Now, instead of all citizens carrying their government&#8217;s debt directly, wireless subscribers pay the that portion of the public debt through their monthly plans with their mobile barons.</p>
<p>Terminal manufacturers are to wireless operators as horse breeders are to barons. Yes, they play a role in the economy, but &#8220;clout&#8221; is hardly a word you could use to describe their influence. Their products are commodities.</p>
<p>In my view, Apple&#8217;s introduction of any kind of phone is a gross error. I presume that they are following a similar strategy as what propelled the Mac to success in face of the staid International Business Machine&#8217;s attempt at creating personal computers. However, the fundamentals are different. In the 1980&#8217;s, Moore&#8217;s Law had just put the constrained resource of computing on an exponential trajectory, upward, through the microprocessor. In Clayton Christsen&#8217;s model of innovation, computing had large populations of unserved markets yet to conquer.</p>
<p>Wireless telephony today is in almost exactly the opposite situation. The constrained resource, in spectrum, is scarce and getting scarcer, while the markets for mobile synchronous voice are thoroughly served by multiple competitors. The form of the mobile terminal offers only incremental opportunities for innovation, as we see in the iPhone.</p>
<p>The Magna Carta conceded the Crown&#8217;s divine authority. However, Britain remained a monarchy for many centuries more.</p>
<p>There is hope for liberation in wireless communication, but I believe that it will come about through a republic, separated from the mother land by a large body of metaphorical water. We can pick that topic up again in another conversation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Hyndman</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/29/verizon-iphone-news-yields-lots-of-me-too-posts-but-little-analysis/#comment-47227</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Hyndman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/29/verizon-iphone-news-yields-lots-of-me-too-posts-but-little-analysis/#comment-47227</guid>
		<description>What a silly thing to say, Anonymous.  My post suggested a discussion, and multiple topics for one.  If I wanted answers, I'd go to wikipedia.  But thanks for helping out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a silly thing to say, Anonymous.  My post suggested a discussion, and multiple topics for one.  If I wanted answers, I&#8217;d go to wikipedia.  But thanks for helping out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/29/verizon-iphone-news-yields-lots-of-me-too-posts-but-little-analysis/#comment-47111</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 03:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/29/verizon-iphone-news-yields-lots-of-me-too-posts-but-little-analysis/#comment-47111</guid>
		<description>"I donâ€™t really have answers to any of these questions."
Pot, Kettle, Black</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I donâ€™t really have answers to any of these questions.&#8221;<br />
Pot, Kettle, Black</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Hyndman</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/29/verizon-iphone-news-yields-lots-of-me-too-posts-but-little-analysis/#comment-47026</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Hyndman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/29/verizon-iphone-news-yields-lots-of-me-too-posts-but-little-analysis/#comment-47026</guid>
		<description>LOL.  Now *that's* funny ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL.  Now *that&#8217;s* funny &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/29/verizon-iphone-news-yields-lots-of-me-too-posts-but-little-analysis/#comment-47025</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 23:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/29/verizon-iphone-news-yields-lots-of-me-too-posts-but-little-analysis/#comment-47025</guid>
		<description>Good points.  It will be interesting to see what happens next. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points.  It will be interesting to see what happens next. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
