Comments on: The Face of Fascism http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/13/the-face-of-fascism/ any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:32:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Rob Hyndman http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/13/the-face-of-fascism/comment-page-1/#comment-44013 Rob Hyndman Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:39:58 +0000 http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/13/the-face-of-fascism/#comment-44013 That's exactly what I think, Patrick. There are people of courage and conscience out there - they need to speak up. That’s exactly what I think, Patrick. There are people of courage and conscience out there – they need to speak up.

]]> By: Patrick Dinnen http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/13/the-face-of-fascism/comment-page-1/#comment-44012 Patrick Dinnen Sat, 13 Jan 2007 15:50:57 +0000 http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/13/the-face-of-fascism/#comment-44012 That is a particularly horrible instance of behaviour from a generally horrible administration. I especially enjoyed the quote from Stimson "I think, quite honestly, when corporate C.E.O.'s see that those firms are representing the very terrorists who hit their bottom line back in 2001, those C.E.O.'s are going to make those law firms choose between representing terrorists or representing reputable firms..." Skipping past the part about 'terrorists who hit their bottom line back in 2001', which is just too horribly backwards to go into. I would hope that the CEOs would see reputable law firms trying to defend the ideal of a just nation, which the pentagon would rather forget, and want to support that defence any way they can. But I'm neither a CEO or an American, so what would I know. That is a particularly horrible instance of behaviour from a generally horrible administration.

I especially enjoyed the quote from Stimson “I think, quite honestly, when corporate C.E.O.’s see that those firms are representing the very terrorists who hit their bottom line back in 2001, those C.E.O.’s are going to make those law firms choose between representing terrorists or representing reputable firms…”

Skipping past the part about ‘terrorists who hit their bottom line back in 2001′, which is just too horribly backwards to go into. I would hope that the CEOs would see reputable law firms trying to defend the ideal of a just nation, which the pentagon would rather forget, and want to support that defence any way they can. But I’m neither a CEO or an American, so what would I know.

]]>