<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yet Another Rave Review for OSX</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/07/yet-another-rave-review-for-osx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/07/yet-another-rave-review-for-osx/</link>
	<description>any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 05:45:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Hyndman</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/07/yet-another-rave-review-for-osx/comment-page-1/#comment-43726</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Hyndman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 10:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/07/yet-another-rave-review-for-osx/#comment-43726</guid>
		<description>Hi Michael,

Thanks for the comment, but the Mini is my second Mac - I&#039;ve been using OSX for months now on another mac and I have not found any of that, at all.  I&#039;m not saying that bad things don&#039;t happen - they clearly do.  But **much** less frequently than Windows.   Hence my comment about spending far less time maintaining systems - I was actually speaking from my own personal experience.

Also, if I need to force quit an app, it happens almost immediately, which almost *never* happened with Windows.  The &quot;other issues&quot; you mention haven&#039;t been a problem for me.

And backup isn&#039;t an issue for me.  An outboard drive and a simple autobackup app takes care of everything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment, but the Mini is my second Mac &#8211; I&#8217;ve been using OSX for months now on another mac and I have not found any of that, at all.  I&#8217;m not saying that bad things don&#8217;t happen &#8211; they clearly do.  But **much** less frequently than Windows.   Hence my comment about spending far less time maintaining systems &#8211; I was actually speaking from my own personal experience.</p>
<p>Also, if I need to force quit an app, it happens almost immediately, which almost *never* happened with Windows.  The &#8220;other issues&#8221; you mention haven&#8217;t been a problem for me.</p>
<p>And backup isn&#8217;t an issue for me.  An outboard drive and a simple autobackup app takes care of everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Webster</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/07/yet-another-rave-review-for-osx/comment-page-1/#comment-43710</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/07/yet-another-rave-review-for-osx/#comment-43710</guid>
		<description>Rob;

I think that you will find that OS X will crash, or applications stall, in roughly the same proportion to Windows.  You have a lot of applications open sucking memory, bad things happen. 

What you don&#039;t need to do as much of is: defrag, registery maintenance -none, backup, when leopard comes out.

But there are other issues: corrupt plists, annoying preferences, and a host of unix problems.

In addition, I have found that OS X takes more time to kill applications, unless you are very comfortable with the unix command line and the kill command.  

Drivers are not so much of an issue, but OS X is not perfect either in this regard.  You will find that you have keep up to date on the periphals.

However, all in all, I vastly prefer OS X to Windows XP sp2, but for largely asthetic reasons.  

There was an excellent review of Tiger on Ars Techincal which you may also want to read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob;</p>
<p>I think that you will find that OS X will crash, or applications stall, in roughly the same proportion to Windows.  You have a lot of applications open sucking memory, bad things happen. </p>
<p>What you don&#8217;t need to do as much of is: defrag, registery maintenance -none, backup, when leopard comes out.</p>
<p>But there are other issues: corrupt plists, annoying preferences, and a host of unix problems.</p>
<p>In addition, I have found that OS X takes more time to kill applications, unless you are very comfortable with the unix command line and the kill command.  </p>
<p>Drivers are not so much of an issue, but OS X is not perfect either in this regard.  You will find that you have keep up to date on the periphals.</p>
<p>However, all in all, I vastly prefer OS X to Windows XP sp2, but for largely asthetic reasons.  </p>
<p>There was an excellent review of Tiger on Ars Techincal which you may also want to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robhyndman.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Blue Screen for Your TV</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/07/yet-another-rave-review-for-osx/comment-page-1/#comment-43476</link>
		<dc:creator>robhyndman.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A Blue Screen for Your TV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 03:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/07/yet-another-rave-review-for-osx/#comment-43476</guid>
		<description>[...] The early news from CES has Bill Gates threatening to do to your TV what Microsoft has done to your PC. No thanks.  &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;     Related Posts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The early news from CES has Bill Gates threatening to do to your TV what Microsoft has done to your PC. No thanks.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;     Related Posts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Hyndman</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/07/yet-another-rave-review-for-osx/comment-page-1/#comment-43475</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Hyndman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 03:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/07/yet-another-rave-review-for-osx/#comment-43475</guid>
		<description>I now spend much less time (i) recovering from application crashes; (ii) recovering from OS crashes: and (iii) fixing system problems (replacing drivers, figuring out application problems - the list is endless).  I could count on several hours a month of this on Windows.  Those days are (very happily) over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I now spend much less time (i) recovering from application crashes; (ii) recovering from OS crashes: and (iii) fixing system problems (replacing drivers, figuring out application problems &#8211; the list is endless).  I could count on several hours a month of this on Windows.  Those days are (very happily) over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Webster</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/07/yet-another-rave-review-for-osx/comment-page-1/#comment-43436</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2007/01/07/yet-another-rave-review-for-osx/#comment-43436</guid>
		<description>I have used both Apple and Windows for many years- home office and business office.

Generally, I prefer Apple for largely asethetic reasons.  OS X looks nicer.

So, I am interested in why you say OS X has reduced the time it takes to keep your systems running.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used both Apple and Windows for many years- home office and business office.</p>
<p>Generally, I prefer Apple for largely asethetic reasons.  OS X looks nicer.</p>
<p>So, I am interested in why you say OS X has reduced the time it takes to keep your systems running.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
