<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&#38;T&#8217;s Neutrality Promise - The Fine Print</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/12/29/atts-neutrality-promise-the-fine-print/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/12/29/atts-neutrality-promise-the-fine-print/</link>
	<description>any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob Hyndman</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/12/29/atts-neutrality-promise-the-fine-print/#comment-40446</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Hyndman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 18:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/12/29/atts-neutrality-promise-the-fine-print/#comment-40446</guid>
		<description>On the face of it, it looks credible.  But the devil would be in the details.  (sigh)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the face of it, it looks credible.  But the devil would be in the details.  (sigh)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/12/29/atts-neutrality-promise-the-fine-print/#comment-40440</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew Ingram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/12/29/atts-neutrality-promise-the-fine-print/#comment-40440</guid>
		<description>Did you see &lt;a href="http://techdirt.com/article.php?sid=20061229/001833#c119"&gt;this comment&lt;/a&gt; at TechDirt, Rob? Not sure how credible it is, but it argues AT&#38;T won't be able to pull the kind of switcheroo Mike is implying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you see <a href="http://techdirt.com/article.php?sid=20061229/001833#c119" onClick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/techdirt.com');">this comment</a> at TechDirt, Rob? Not sure how credible it is, but it argues AT&amp;T won&#8217;t be able to pull the kind of switcheroo Mike is implying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
