Lieberman’s Revenge?
One has to wonder, as the final tally on the U.S. Senate looks to be close to the 1 seat majority the Democrats need to take both branches of Congress, what’s next for Joe Lieberman. Abandoned by the Democrats, he’s hung on to his seat in the face of a fierce challenge from Ned Lamont, but as an independent. He says he’ll caucus with the Democrats. At what price? Question 2: whither netroots when it mattered?
Related Posts
Lieberman’s Revenge, Redux
U.S. Election Now in the Bag
YearlyKos in Las Vegas
“My party is appealing to a real meanness”
U.S. 2006 Elections - A Battle for Google
Democrats Continue to Eat Their Young
That’s How You Do it Obama
This is the Trackback URI

/images/rss.jpg)
Joe just went from being a potential has-been to possibly being one of the most powerful dudes in DC. And Lieberman has far more experience than Jim Jeffords so he’ll likely wield this unique position to far greater effect. It’s a good day to be Joe.
“It’s a good day to be Joe.” I wish I’d used that as a title :).
Whither netroots? They ran Lieberman - VP nominee Lieberman - off the Democratic ticket in the primaries. Then in the main election, the “netroots” candidate Lamont faced the full might of both the Democratic and Republican parties pulling for Lieberman to win, and Lamont still got 40% of the vote. What do you want, a pony?
Shit, if the lesson here is “20-year Senate veterans who were their party’s VP candidate and happen to have the other party pulling for them to win too are pretty hard to beat, even if the netroots are against them”, well, I guess we’ve learned it.
Thanks, Anon. I think I would have preferred the pony.