<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forrester on YouTube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/10/02/forrester-on-youtube/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/10/02/forrester-on-youtube/</link>
	<description>any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:33:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Showdown at the YouTube corral &#124; Lawgarithms &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/10/02/forrester-on-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-78835</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Showdown at the YouTube corral &#124; Lawgarithms &#124; ZDNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 22:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/10/02/forrester-on-youtube/#comment-78835</guid>
		<description>[...] Forrester on YouTube [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Forrester on YouTube [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Hyndman</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/10/02/forrester-on-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-17760</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Hyndman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 01:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/10/02/forrester-on-youtube/#comment-17760</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Fred.  Time to call your lawyer, I think - he doesn&#039;t have the Grokster test quite right.  Especially after the trial reconsideration.

And of course I have checked YouTube lately - loads of the top videos are infringing (I think the Forrester and IDC guys can be expected to at least get that right) - it varies a lot, but it&#039;s been about 50% of the top viewed on the occasions I&#039;ve checked recently.  Not scientific, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Fred.  Time to call your lawyer, I think &#8211; he doesn&#8217;t have the Grokster test quite right.  Especially after the trial reconsideration.</p>
<p>And of course I have checked YouTube lately &#8211; loads of the top videos are infringing (I think the Forrester and IDC guys can be expected to at least get that right) &#8211; it varies a lot, but it&#8217;s been about 50% of the top viewed on the occasions I&#8217;ve checked recently.  Not scientific, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/10/02/forrester-on-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-17756</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 00:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/10/02/forrester-on-youtube/#comment-17756</guid>
		<description>i&#039;ve never understood why people pay money for flawed analysis like that.

if you look at the most popular videos on youtube

http://www.youtube.com/browse?s=mp

very few of them come from mainstream media.

and if you read the opinion in the grokster case, the service has to be devoid of &quot;non infringing&quot; uses to be shut down.

you can get better information on the blogs for free than the crap these high priced research shops shovel out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ve never understood why people pay money for flawed analysis like that.</p>
<p>if you look at the most popular videos on youtube</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/browse?s=mp" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/browse?s=mp</a></p>
<p>very few of them come from mainstream media.</p>
<p>and if you read the opinion in the grokster case, the service has to be devoid of &#8220;non infringing&#8221; uses to be shut down.</p>
<p>you can get better information on the blogs for free than the crap these high priced research shops shovel out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
