<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the Slow Death of Radio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/09/17/on-the-slow-death-of-radio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/09/17/on-the-slow-death-of-radio/</link>
	<description>any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:32:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: robhyndman.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The (Slow) Death of Radio, Redux</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/09/17/on-the-slow-death-of-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-18973</link>
		<dc:creator>robhyndman.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The (Slow) Death of Radio, Redux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/09/17/on-the-slow-death-of-radio/#comment-18973</guid>
		<description>[...] More stats from the NYT on radio&#8217;s irrelevantization (?). Two culprits: attention for earshare (but we knew that already), and radio&#8217;s failure to pursue the young - is this the inevitable result of much of radio&#8217;s decision in the last 20 years to focus its attention on talk radio and the &#8216;middle-class middle-aged angry-white-male&#8217; demographic?      Related Posts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More stats from the NYT on radio&#8217;s irrelevantization (?). Two culprits: attention for earshare (but we knew that already), and radio&#8217;s failure to pursue the young &#8211; is this the inevitable result of much of radio&#8217;s decision in the last 20 years to focus its attention on talk radio and the &#8216;middle-class middle-aged angry-white-male&#8217; demographic?      Related Posts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StrayPackets &#183; Radio is Dead, Again</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/09/17/on-the-slow-death-of-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-14938</link>
		<dc:creator>StrayPackets &#183; Radio is Dead, Again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/09/17/on-the-slow-death-of-radio/#comment-14938</guid>
		<description>[...] The New York Times&#8217; piece about the diminishing fortune of traditional radio is getting a fair amount of play. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The New York Times&#8217; piece about the diminishing fortune of traditional radio is getting a fair amount of play. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

