<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Universal v. YouTube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/09/15/more-on-universal-v-youtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/09/15/more-on-universal-v-youtube/</link>
	<description>any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:32:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor Attridge</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/09/15/more-on-universal-v-youtube/comment-page-1/#comment-17874</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor Attridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/09/15/more-on-universal-v-youtube/#comment-17874</guid>
		<description>Where Warner Brothers is smart :

There are a couple of points, firstly most videos on YouTube have come from a broadcast situation having previously being aired and therefore this is merely an extension of this medium. Generating buzz around brands and bands is in this day an age not a bad thing, and is the future of connecting with consumers.
 
The quality issue which people point to as allowing this medium to exist ( therefore in some way removes it from a required purchase ) will disappear soon as technology improves , so this argument is only short term.   
 
Where everyone does win , is in the area of long tail items which everyone knows makes up the bulk of most companies profits in the online arena.  
 
Being sensible , partnering with Youtube to offer people the chance to purchase material through their portals represents an opportunity I know Warner will be taking advantage of.  
 
In the short term they are raising band ( or brand ) awareness , it is only a matter of time before purchase options to consumers are offered by extending the technology to identify the items they are viewing  and present contextual and relevant options . I  know I would have bought the backstreet boys sony after watching those Chinese students sing into their brushes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where Warner Brothers is smart :</p>
<p>There are a couple of points, firstly most videos on YouTube have come from a broadcast situation having previously being aired and therefore this is merely an extension of this medium. Generating buzz around brands and bands is in this day an age not a bad thing, and is the future of connecting with consumers.</p>
<p>The quality issue which people point to as allowing this medium to exist ( therefore in some way removes it from a required purchase ) will disappear soon as technology improves , so this argument is only short term.   </p>
<p>Where everyone does win , is in the area of long tail items which everyone knows makes up the bulk of most companies profits in the online arena.  </p>
<p>Being sensible , partnering with Youtube to offer people the chance to purchase material through their portals represents an opportunity I know Warner will be taking advantage of.  </p>
<p>In the short term they are raising band ( or brand ) awareness , it is only a matter of time before purchase options to consumers are offered by extending the technology to identify the items they are viewing  and present contextual and relevant options . I  know I would have bought the backstreet boys sony after watching those Chinese students sing into their brushes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

