<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paying Diggers &#8211; Once More, into the Breach</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/09/14/paying-diggers-once-more-into-the-breach/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/09/14/paying-diggers-once-more-into-the-breach/</link>
	<description>any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:32:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diggers will find a way to get paid &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/09/14/paying-diggers-once-more-into-the-breach/comment-page-1/#comment-34904</link>
		<dc:creator>Diggers will find a way to get paid &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 15:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/09/14/paying-diggers-once-more-into-the-breach/#comment-34904</guid>
		<description>[...] All of this tends (although I hate to admit it) to support my friend Rob Hyndman&#8217;s contention that top Diggers should be compensated because what they do is effectively work, and that Jason Calacanis recognized that and rewarded it (Rob&#8217;s thoughts can be found in the comments here, and in his post here). My argument has always been that Diggers get rewarded in other ways that are non-financial &#8212; they get bragging rights, for example, and the admiration of their peers, which in some cases is worth more than money. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] All of this tends (although I hate to admit it) to support my friend Rob Hyndman&#8217;s contention that top Diggers should be compensated because what they do is effectively work, and that Jason Calacanis recognized that and rewarded it (Rob&#8217;s thoughts can be found in the comments here, and in his post here). My argument has always been that Diggers get rewarded in other ways that are non-financial &#8212; they get bragging rights, for example, and the admiration of their peers, which in some cases is worth more than money. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewingram.com/media &#187; Diggers will find a way to get paid</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/09/14/paying-diggers-once-more-into-the-breach/comment-page-1/#comment-34596</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewingram.com/media &#187; Diggers will find a way to get paid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 20:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/09/14/paying-diggers-once-more-into-the-breach/#comment-34596</guid>
		<description>[...] All of this tends (although I hate to admit it) to support my friend Rob Hyndman&#8217;s contention that top Diggers should be compensated because what they do is effectively work, and that Jason Calacanis recognized that and rewarded it (Rob&#8217;s thoughts can be found in the comments here, and in his post here). My argument has always been that Diggers get rewarded in other ways that are non-financial &#8212; they get bragging rights, for example, and the admiration of their peers, which in some cases is worth more than money. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] All of this tends (although I hate to admit it) to support my friend Rob Hyndman&#8217;s contention that top Diggers should be compensated because what they do is effectively work, and that Jason Calacanis recognized that and rewarded it (Rob&#8217;s thoughts can be found in the comments here, and in his post here). My argument has always been that Diggers get rewarded in other ways that are non-financial &#8212; they get bragging rights, for example, and the admiration of their peers, which in some cases is worth more than money. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Legalizing The Underground Digg Economy</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/09/14/paying-diggers-once-more-into-the-breach/comment-page-1/#comment-34574</link>
		<dc:creator>Legalizing The Underground Digg Economy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 19:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/09/14/paying-diggers-once-more-into-the-breach/#comment-34574</guid>
		<description>[...] It appears that not only is the Netscape model succeeding, but the Kevin Rose model is failing, with top Diggers thinking, If Kevin Rose isnâ€™t going to pay me for my time, maybe someone else will. As Matt Ingram mentions, this ultimately supports Rob Hyndman&#8217;s belief that Diggers deserve to get paid for their hard work. Bragging rights via a place on the Digg Top Users leaderboard isn&#8217;t enough, and this fact is becoming more and more apparent. Curtiss Thompson, a top Digger, shares his thoughts on Ad Revenue Sharing in Social Media. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It appears that not only is the Netscape model succeeding, but the Kevin Rose model is failing, with top Diggers thinking, If Kevin Rose isnâ€™t going to pay me for my time, maybe someone else will. As Matt Ingram mentions, this ultimately supports Rob Hyndman&#8217;s belief that Diggers deserve to get paid for their hard work. Bragging rights via a place on the Digg Top Users leaderboard isn&#8217;t enough, and this fact is becoming more and more apparent. Curtiss Thompson, a top Digger, shares his thoughts on Ad Revenue Sharing in Social Media. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Hyndman</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/09/14/paying-diggers-once-more-into-the-breach/comment-page-1/#comment-14173</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Hyndman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/09/14/paying-diggers-once-more-into-the-breach/#comment-14173</guid>
		<description>Well, maybe, but they do already spend lots of time preventing that for other forms of abuse - they&#039;re on top of it, or need to get on top of it to maintain the integrity of the community.  Just a part of managing the community, IMO - like spam, etc. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, maybe, but they do already spend lots of time preventing that for other forms of abuse &#8211; they&#8217;re on top of it, or need to get on top of it to maintain the integrity of the community.  Just a part of managing the community, IMO &#8211; like spam, etc. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/09/14/paying-diggers-once-more-into-the-breach/comment-page-1/#comment-14165</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew Ingram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/09/14/paying-diggers-once-more-into-the-breach/#comment-14165</guid>
		<description>Man, you are soooooooo wrong  :-)

Seriously though, it occurred to me that maybe Kevin doesn&#039;t want to pay top Diggers in part because that would provide even more incentive for people to try and &quot;game the system.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, you are soooooooo wrong  :-)</p>
<p>Seriously though, it occurred to me that maybe Kevin doesn&#8217;t want to pay top Diggers in part because that would provide even more incentive for people to try and &#8220;game the system.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

