<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Neuroscience of Wine Ratings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/08/26/the-neuroscience-of-wine-ratings/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/08/26/the-neuroscience-of-wine-ratings/</link>
	<description>any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/08/26/the-neuroscience-of-wine-ratings/#comment-85348</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/08/26/the-neuroscience-of-wine-ratings/#comment-85348</guid>
		<description>Also true: "a description of a wine without a rating is for suckers".  So choose which sucker you would prefer to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also true: &#8220;a description of a wine without a rating is for suckers&#8221;.  So choose which sucker you would prefer to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
