<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CEO Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/07/30/ceo-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/07/30/ceo-blogging/</link>
	<description>any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:32:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Tsiolis</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/07/30/ceo-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-8479</link>
		<dc:creator>George Tsiolis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 05:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/07/30/ceo-blogging/#comment-8479</guid>
		<description>Rob, case in point (from NY Times article)

&quot;In contrast, Mr. Schwartz has posted his thoughts, very much on the fly, five times a month for two years. Over time he has earned credibility by his willingness to put in public view his unfiltered ruminations on a regular basis. 

That credibility was needed last week, when he sought to put a positive spin on Sunâ€™s quarterly earnings, his first as chief executive.... 
After the earnings release, Mr. Schwartz itemized on his blog the many positive developments that he sees in the companyâ€™s business. Viewed alone, it would be easy for unhappy investors to dismiss. But read as the latest installment of candid self-evaluations of the companyâ€™s strategic initiatives and performance, Mr. Schwartzâ€™s optimism exerts a tonic effect.&quot;

1:Many Communications

The article also raises an advantage of blogging that we have been stating from day 1 through our web-based IR system.  Specifically, the advantage and efficiency of 1:Many vs 1:1 communications.

Best,
George</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob, case in point (from NY Times article)</p>
<p>&#8220;In contrast, Mr. Schwartz has posted his thoughts, very much on the fly, five times a month for two years. Over time he has earned credibility by his willingness to put in public view his unfiltered ruminations on a regular basis. </p>
<p>That credibility was needed last week, when he sought to put a positive spin on Sunâ€™s quarterly earnings, his first as chief executive&#8230;.<br />
After the earnings release, Mr. Schwartz itemized on his blog the many positive developments that he sees in the companyâ€™s business. Viewed alone, it would be easy for unhappy investors to dismiss. But read as the latest installment of candid self-evaluations of the companyâ€™s strategic initiatives and performance, Mr. Schwartzâ€™s optimism exerts a tonic effect.&#8221;</p>
<p>1:Many Communications</p>
<p>The article also raises an advantage of blogging that we have been stating from day 1 through our web-based IR system.  Specifically, the advantage and efficiency of 1:Many vs 1:1 communications.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Tsiolis</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/07/30/ceo-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-8477</link>
		<dc:creator>George Tsiolis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 04:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/07/30/ceo-blogging/#comment-8477</guid>
		<description>Hi, Rob.  Given the fact I may be the one with the most experience on point here through Agoracom, I can definitively state that blogging/direct communications by CEO&#039;s is invaluable.

Why?

Investors are savvy people and they know when they&#039;re being fed a canned message.  For the most part, they&#039;re OK with that because they understand that a CEO needs to spend mos of their time selling widgets and creating shareholder value.  However, nothing builds long-term loyalty better than direct communications from a CEO that genuinely wants to build a long-term relationship with shareholders.  That can only be accomplished when he/she walks out from behind the desk, rolls up the sleeves and shares real moments with them.  In a world of firewalls and Chinese walls, investors are hungry for it.

Trust me, investors know the difference and appreciate it.  It truly pays dividends during the tough times when a CEO requires and requests faith in his command, which shareholders will provide thanks to credit built over time.

In response to the issue about time requirements, it is true that a blog takes a great deal of time but shareholder expectations can be managed by letting them know there will be times when business prorities prevent regular posting.  Even 1 post every 2 weeks will more than suffice, while anything more frequent will simply be a bonus.

We&#039;ve built a pretty robust business out of providing the investment community with direct access to executives of micro-cap companies, so I hope my input has helped shed some valuable light on the topic.

Best,
George</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Rob.  Given the fact I may be the one with the most experience on point here through Agoracom, I can definitively state that blogging/direct communications by CEO&#8217;s is invaluable.</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>Investors are savvy people and they know when they&#8217;re being fed a canned message.  For the most part, they&#8217;re OK with that because they understand that a CEO needs to spend mos of their time selling widgets and creating shareholder value.  However, nothing builds long-term loyalty better than direct communications from a CEO that genuinely wants to build a long-term relationship with shareholders.  That can only be accomplished when he/she walks out from behind the desk, rolls up the sleeves and shares real moments with them.  In a world of firewalls and Chinese walls, investors are hungry for it.</p>
<p>Trust me, investors know the difference and appreciate it.  It truly pays dividends during the tough times when a CEO requires and requests faith in his command, which shareholders will provide thanks to credit built over time.</p>
<p>In response to the issue about time requirements, it is true that a blog takes a great deal of time but shareholder expectations can be managed by letting them know there will be times when business prorities prevent regular posting.  Even 1 post every 2 weeks will more than suffice, while anything more frequent will simply be a bonus.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve built a pretty robust business out of providing the investment community with direct access to executives of micro-cap companies, so I hope my input has helped shed some valuable light on the topic.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IT Blogwatch</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/07/30/ceo-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-8440</link>
		<dc:creator>IT Blogwatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/07/30/ceo-blogging/#comment-8440</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Does your CEO blog? (and ech hob dir in drerd)...&lt;/strong&gt;

Oh looky, it&#039;s Monday&#039;s IT Blogwatch, in which we ask, Why don&#039;t more CEOs blog? Not to mention a classic example of why you should never write email or send voicemail that you wouldn&#039;t want blogged -- are you listening, Darren Sherman?.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Does your CEO blog? (and ech hob dir in drerd)&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Oh looky, it&#8217;s Monday&#8217;s IT Blogwatch, in which we ask, Why don&#8217;t more CEOs blog? Not to mention a classic example of why you should never write email or send voicemail that you wouldn&#8217;t want blogged &#8212; are you listening, Darren Sherman?&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Hyndman</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/07/30/ceo-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-8439</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Hyndman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/07/30/ceo-blogging/#comment-8439</guid>
		<description>As I recall, he didn&#039;t really answer directly, except to say that time would be in short supply.  I checked the campaign&#039;s site, and he is attributed as author on some posts, but they are essentially press releases and what look like canned bits released on significant days (Canada Day, Jean-Baptiste Day, and such-like).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I recall, he didn&#8217;t really answer directly, except to say that time would be in short supply.  I checked the campaign&#8217;s site, and he is attributed as author on some posts, but they are essentially press releases and what look like canned bits released on significant days (Canada Day, Jean-Baptiste Day, and such-like).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph Thornley</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/07/30/ceo-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-8426</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph Thornley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 02:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/07/30/ceo-blogging/#comment-8426</guid>
		<description>Hi Rob,
Your post says that Michael Ignatieff was being asked a question about his own intentions re blogging. Did you catch his answer? If any political leader has the writing tools necessary to blog, it would be Ignetieff. How did he respond to the question?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rob,<br />
Your post says that Michael Ignatieff was being asked a question about his own intentions re blogging. Did you catch his answer? If any political leader has the writing tools necessary to blog, it would be Ignetieff. How did he respond to the question?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/07/30/ceo-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-8401</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2006 12:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/07/30/ceo-blogging/#comment-8401</guid>
		<description>rob,
i&#039;d also add that sarbannes-oxley is another huge blogging obstacle facing CEOs, who head publicly-traded companies. the idea that every comment has to be carefully processed and scrutinized by PR and IR folks and lawyers before it could even see the light of day on a blog is daunting. Even if a CEO is willing to oh-so-carefully navigate their way through these issues, there is only so much he/she can really discuss in an open and frank way (and there&#039;s your point about time). At the end of the day, why bother?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rob,<br />
i&#8217;d also add that sarbannes-oxley is another huge blogging obstacle facing CEOs, who head publicly-traded companies. the idea that every comment has to be carefully processed and scrutinized by PR and IR folks and lawyers before it could even see the light of day on a blog is daunting. Even if a CEO is willing to oh-so-carefully navigate their way through these issues, there is only so much he/she can really discuss in an open and frank way (and there&#8217;s your point about time). At the end of the day, why bother?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

