<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Strength of Wikipedia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/07/10/the-strength-of-wikipedia/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/07/10/the-strength-of-wikipedia/</link>
	<description>any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 02:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Kent</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/07/10/the-strength-of-wikipedia/#comment-6802</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 05:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/07/10/the-strength-of-wikipedia/#comment-6802</guid>
		<description>So many things have been said about Wikipedia, but it's a fact that many people all over the world use it, inaccurate or not, and it's here to stay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So many things have been said about Wikipedia, but it&#8217;s a fact that many people all over the world use it, inaccurate or not, and it&#8217;s here to stay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/07/10/the-strength-of-wikipedia/#comment-6777</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/07/10/the-strength-of-wikipedia/#comment-6777</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Yet another Wikipedia death notice...&lt;/strong&gt;

It&#8217;s tough to come up with something that has been declared either dead, broken or irrelevant as many times as Wikipedia.org (okay, the Bush presidency comes close, but that&#8217;s in a different category altogether). Nick Carr alone has probabl...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Yet another Wikipedia death notice&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s tough to come up with something that has been declared either dead, broken or irrelevant as many times as Wikipedia.org (okay, the Bush presidency comes close, but that&#8217;s in a different category altogether). Nick Carr alone has probabl&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Marman</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/07/10/the-strength-of-wikipedia/#comment-6699</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Marman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 01:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/07/10/the-strength-of-wikipedia/#comment-6699</guid>
		<description>Loosely related, and I know it's been covered to death: but doesn't Ken Lay's death remind of something on 24? I'm remembering Jack Bauer's "death" and .... Ok, enough of that. Sorry.

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loosely related, and I know it&#8217;s been covered to death: but doesn&#8217;t Ken Lay&#8217;s death remind of something on 24? I&#8217;m remembering Jack Bauer&#8217;s &#8220;death&#8221; and &#8230;. Ok, enough of that. Sorry.</p>
<p>:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
