<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Digg v. NYT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/07/07/more-on-digg-v-nyt/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/07/07/more-on-digg-v-nyt/</link>
	<description>any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Digg vs. the NYT &#8212; wrong question &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/07/07/more-on-digg-v-nyt/#comment-6463</link>
		<dc:creator>Digg vs. the NYT &#8212; wrong question &#187; Mathew Ingram: mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2006 17:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/07/07/more-on-digg-v-nyt/#comment-6463</guid>
		<description>[...] One common reaction to the issue has been to scoff at the idea that something like Digg could take the place of the New York Times &#8212; and it&#8217;s quite reasonable to scoff at this idea, since no one in their right mind (including Kevin Rose and other Digg types, I would wager) would ever make such a ridiculous claim. My friend Rob Hyndman, who like me is a newspaper addict, is quite right that nothing will ever take the place of the New York Times. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] One common reaction to the issue has been to scoff at the idea that something like Digg could take the place of the New York Times &#8212; and it&#8217;s quite reasonable to scoff at this idea, since no one in their right mind (including Kevin Rose and other Digg types, I would wager) would ever make such a ridiculous claim. My friend Rob Hyndman, who like me is a newspaper addict, is quite right that nothing will ever take the place of the New York Times. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
