<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bloggers as Journalists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/06/07/bloggers-as-journalists/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/06/07/bloggers-as-journalists/</link>
	<description>any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Young</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/06/07/bloggers-as-journalists/#comment-4287</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 06:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/06/07/bloggers-as-journalists/#comment-4287</guid>
		<description>I fear the technology is way out in front of the law on this one. Canadian defamation laws place the onus squarely on the bloggers to defend their speech - something most bloggers can ill afford -, and deny them qualified privilege in the public interest save in extraordinary circumstances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fear the technology is way out in front of the law on this one. Canadian defamation laws place the onus squarely on the bloggers to defend their speech - something most bloggers can ill afford -, and deny them qualified privilege in the public interest save in extraordinary circumstances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
