<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future of Books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/06/06/the-future-of-books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/06/06/the-future-of-books/</link>
	<description>any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:33:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Book.net</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/06/06/the-future-of-books/comment-page-1/#comment-4102</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzMachine &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Book.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 09:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/06/06/the-future-of-books/#comment-4102</guid>
		<description>[...] : Rob Hyndman asks the important question: For those of us who spend a lot of time on the Web Jeffâ€™s vision of the bookâ€™s future will seem an almost natural evolution. And thatâ€™s fine. But Iâ€™m willing to wager that many who spend a lot of time on the Web have already largely left the world of books behind them - and perhaps also even essay-oriented magazines - challenged by the pressures of time and the promise of the Webâ€™s easier diversions to find the time to focus to the extent required to truly enjoy a good book or the latest New Yorker. I suspect that this raises one of the harder questions raised by Jeffâ€™s vision: will books continue to be a place where immersive thought and extended time are required, or are they morphing into another channel in the always-on, million-channel universe, full of clicks and links and chats and tunes and videos; full of flashing lights and tinkling bells, an easy rest-stop for those who prefer to skim lightly over the surface of the worldâ€™s ideas? And of course, who decides? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] : Rob Hyndman asks the important question: For those of us who spend a lot of time on the Web Jeffâ€™s vision of the bookâ€™s future will seem an almost natural evolution. And thatâ€™s fine. But Iâ€™m willing to wager that many who spend a lot of time on the Web have already largely left the world of books behind them &#8211; and perhaps also even essay-oriented magazines &#8211; challenged by the pressures of time and the promise of the Webâ€™s easier diversions to find the time to focus to the extent required to truly enjoy a good book or the latest New Yorker. I suspect that this raises one of the harder questions raised by Jeffâ€™s vision: will books continue to be a place where immersive thought and extended time are required, or are they morphing into another channel in the always-on, million-channel universe, full of clicks and links and chats and tunes and videos; full of flashing lights and tinkling bells, an easy rest-stop for those who prefer to skim lightly over the surface of the worldâ€™s ideas? And of course, who decides? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Yanis</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/06/06/the-future-of-books/comment-page-1/#comment-4100</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Yanis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 07:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/06/06/the-future-of-books/#comment-4100</guid>
		<description>Interactive media products are going to proliferate, but totally replace good, old-fashioned books? I don&#039;t think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interactive media products are going to proliferate, but totally replace good, old-fashioned books? I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tad McIlwraith</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/06/06/the-future-of-books/comment-page-1/#comment-4080</link>
		<dc:creator>Tad McIlwraith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 16:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/06/06/the-future-of-books/#comment-4080</guid>
		<description>Rob ... this post seems as related to your posts about unplugging every once in a while as any of the posts you note in the &#039;Related Posts&#039; area above.  One of the great pleasures in reading a book -- and you hint at this throughout the post -- is leaving everything else behind.  Many of us do check the web for the ideas of others about what we read but I appreciate being able to separate the two at least until I have had time to form my own opinions.

(And why wouldn&#039;t a media-heavy version of fiction like Tolkein or Dan Brown benefit from hyper-links and additional content?  It&#039;s a real possibility ... and I suspect it already exists ... but one thing a time, no?)

Let the readers decide ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob &#8230; this post seems as related to your posts about unplugging every once in a while as any of the posts you note in the &#8216;Related Posts&#8217; area above.  One of the great pleasures in reading a book &#8212; and you hint at this throughout the post &#8212; is leaving everything else behind.  Many of us do check the web for the ideas of others about what we read but I appreciate being able to separate the two at least until I have had time to form my own opinions.</p>
<p>(And why wouldn&#8217;t a media-heavy version of fiction like Tolkein or Dan Brown benefit from hyper-links and additional content?  It&#8217;s a real possibility &#8230; and I suspect it already exists &#8230; but one thing a time, no?)</p>
<p>Let the readers decide &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
