Comments on: Apple’s Aperture to be Abandoned? http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/04/28/apples-aperture-to-be-abandoned/ any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:32:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Lee Dale http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/04/28/apples-aperture-to-be-abandoned/comment-page-1/#comment-2284 Lee Dale Sat, 29 Apr 2006 05:48:03 +0000 http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/04/28/apples-aperture-to-be-abandoned/#comment-2284 Some of Cringley's concepts certainly are compelling (Adobe, Office), but it would be nice if he knew what Aperture was before suggesting that it would bow to Photoshop. They're not comparable apps. Doesn't help his credibility. And on that note, it doesn't look like Aperture is going anywhere. See: http://blakeseely.com/blog/archives/2006/04/27/change/trackback/ Some of Cringley’s concepts certainly are compelling (Adobe, Office), but it would be nice if he knew what Aperture was before suggesting that it would bow to Photoshop. They’re not comparable apps. Doesn’t help his credibility.

And on that note, it doesn’t look like Aperture is going anywhere. See: http://blakeseely.com/blog/archives/2006/04/27/change/trackback/

]]>