<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google on Search Queries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/03/18/google-on-search-queries/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/03/18/google-on-search-queries/</link>
	<description>any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: robhyndman.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More on the Google Subpoena Case</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/03/18/google-on-search-queries/#comment-1318</link>
		<dc:creator>robhyndman.com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More on the Google Subpoena Case</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Mar 2006 13:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/03/18/google-on-search-queries/#comment-1318</guid>
		<description>[...] Apropos my recent blog of Google&#8217;s post on the DOJ subpoena case, Daniel Solove has posted a thorough examination of the decision. He quite rightly wonders why the MSM was so wrong on the story of the decision.      Related Posts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apropos my recent blog of Google&#8217;s post on the DOJ subpoena case, Daniel Solove has posted a thorough examination of the decision. He quite rightly wonders why the MSM was so wrong on the story of the decision.      Related Posts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
