<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Things Are Just Starting to Get Interesting Around Here</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/02/17/things-are-just-starting-to-get-interesting-around-here/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/02/17/things-are-just-starting-to-get-interesting-around-here/</link>
	<description>any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:32:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart MacDonald</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/02/17/things-are-just-starting-to-get-interesting-around-here/comment-page-1/#comment-1124</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart MacDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 03:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/02/17/things-are-just-starting-to-get-interesting-around-here/#comment-1124</guid>
		<description>To me, the uber-issue on all of this navel-gazing/State of the Blogosphere/&quot;I&#039;m A-er than you&quot; stuff over the past 10 days or so is the amount of bandwidth being spilt by bloggers about blogging and the state thereof. Why can&#039;t folks get back to talking about other things about which they have passion -- which I think is the core excitement of the &#039;spere. This current meme is raising the whole Hall Of Mirrors analogy to a whole new level.

Move on, people. Nothing to see here.

-- Stuart</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, the uber-issue on all of this navel-gazing/State of the Blogosphere/&#8221;I&#8217;m A-er than you&#8221; stuff over the past 10 days or so is the amount of bandwidth being spilt by bloggers about blogging and the state thereof. Why can&#8217;t folks get back to talking about other things about which they have passion &#8212; which I think is the core excitement of the &#8216;spere. This current meme is raising the whole Hall Of Mirrors analogy to a whole new level.</p>
<p>Move on, people. Nothing to see here.</p>
<p>&#8211; Stuart</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/02/17/things-are-just-starting-to-get-interesting-around-here/comment-page-1/#comment-1123</link>
		<dc:creator>mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/02/17/things-are-just-starting-to-get-interesting-around-here/#comment-1123</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Yeah, blogs are so last year, dude&#8230;...&lt;/strong&gt;

	Lots of chatter in the blogosphere about whether blogs are dead, whether blogs can ever achieve anything, whether blogs will mean the death of civilization as we know it, whether my blog can beat up your blog, and so on - all of which was sparked by t...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Yeah, blogs are so last year, dude&#8230;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>	Lots of chatter in the blogosphere about whether blogs are dead, whether blogs can ever achieve anything, whether blogs will mean the death of civilization as we know it, whether my blog can beat up your blog, and so on &#8211; all of which was sparked by t&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tris Hussey</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/02/17/things-are-just-starting-to-get-interesting-around-here/comment-page-1/#comment-1122</link>
		<dc:creator>Tris Hussey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/02/17/things-are-just-starting-to-get-interesting-around-here/#comment-1122</guid>
		<description>I agree with Mark ... the combination of things like tech.memorandum, megite (with personalization), and BlogCode will start to work towards this end, but we&#039;ll have to see how these can be mashed up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Mark &#8230; the combination of things like tech.memorandum, megite (with personalization), and BlogCode will start to work towards this end, but we&#8217;ll have to see how these can be mashed up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark evans</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/02/17/things-are-just-starting-to-get-interesting-around-here/comment-page-1/#comment-1121</link>
		<dc:creator>mark evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 12:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/02/17/things-are-just-starting-to-get-interesting-around-here/#comment-1121</guid>
		<description>rob,
your last paragraph is perhaps the most intriguing because it suggests that lots and lots of conversation is good but at some point, the cream will rise to the top. the challenge, i think, is how that happens. will it be an algorithm that facilitates it? Or will it be something like blogcode where bloggers rank each other? this is a question i&#039;ve been trying to tackle for months. the best idea that i could could come up with a combination of a google algorithm and an ebay-like peer rating system. another approach is simply the early-days yahoo methodology in which they picked web sites they thought were interesting/good. i started this project - http://bestblogs.wikispaces.com/ - but had to stop because it seemed such an immense job.

cheers, mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rob,<br />
your last paragraph is perhaps the most intriguing because it suggests that lots and lots of conversation is good but at some point, the cream will rise to the top. the challenge, i think, is how that happens. will it be an algorithm that facilitates it? Or will it be something like blogcode where bloggers rank each other? this is a question i&#8217;ve been trying to tackle for months. the best idea that i could could come up with a combination of a google algorithm and an ebay-like peer rating system. another approach is simply the early-days yahoo methodology in which they picked web sites they thought were interesting/good. i started this project &#8211; <a href="http://bestblogs.wikispaces.com/" rel="nofollow">http://bestblogs.wikispaces.com/</a> &#8211; but had to stop because it seemed such an immense job.</p>
<p>cheers, mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

