Comments on: Anonymity and the Self-Righteous Internet http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/01/22/anonymity-and-the-self-righteous-internet/ any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:32:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Computerworld Blogs http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/01/22/anonymity-and-the-self-righteous-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-992 Computerworld Blogs Mon, 23 Jan 2006 13:18:07 +0000 http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/01/22/anonymity-and-the-self-righteous-internet/#comment-992 <strong>WaPo-gate (and PLOrk premier)...</strong> In today's IT Blogwatch, we look at the storm around the Washington Post's new "no comment" policy. Not to mention world premier of PLOrk, the Princeton Laptop Orchestra... ... WaPo-gate (and PLOrk premier)…

In today’s IT Blogwatch, we look at the storm around the Washington Post’s new "no comment" policy. Not to mention world premier of PLOrk, the Princeton Laptop Orchestra…
…

]]> By: N.M.R. Nomas http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/01/22/anonymity-and-the-self-righteous-internet/comment-page-1/#comment-989 N.M.R. Nomas Mon, 23 Jan 2006 04:29:27 +0000 http://www.robhyndman.com/2006/01/22/anonymity-and-the-self-righteous-internet/#comment-989 Howell's lies brought on her own trouble. Her follow up is likely to bring more. 1. Indian Tribes are a traditional Democratic constituencey. 2. The documentary evidence looks like Abramoff says CUT BACK on donations to DEMOCRATS. 3. Financial evidence suggests the verbal threats were even stronger because the documentary suggestions are more than actual (for Democrats, only). 4. It is hard to imagine that a man so steeped in the Republican Party as Abramoff, so sharply linked to so many key Republican "leaders" including Norquest, Reed, DeLay, etc., and so specifically tied to th Republican agenda would press for Democratic donations. This doesn't pass the laugh test. Howell’s lies brought on her own trouble. Her follow up is likely to bring more.

1. Indian Tribes are a traditional Democratic constituencey.
2. The documentary evidence looks like Abramoff says CUT BACK on donations to DEMOCRATS.
3. Financial evidence suggests the verbal threats were even stronger because the documentary suggestions are more than actual (for Democrats, only).
4. It is hard to imagine that a man so steeped in the Republican Party as Abramoff, so sharply linked to so many key Republican “leaders” including Norquest, Reed, DeLay, etc., and so specifically tied to th Republican agenda would press for Democratic donations. This doesn’t pass the laugh test.

]]>