<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Celphone Cloning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robhyndman.com/2005/12/17/celphone-cloning/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2005/12/17/celphone-cloning/</link>
	<description>any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 16:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chis</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2005/12/17/celphone-cloning/#comment-6318</link>
		<dc:creator>Chis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 04:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2005/12/17/celphone-cloning/#comment-6318</guid>
		<description>What about the practical, legitimate aspect of cloning for those requiring permanent connections to amplifiers and antennas because of poor signal?

I've been researching the subject for a long time and I have yet to see anyone talk about legitimate use of cloning for those of us who live in fringe areas where signal reception is poor and would like to have permanently wired 'extensions' of one's phone connected to amplifiers and antennas in order to simply get service!

What about using antenna adapters you may say? Fact of the matter is, phones are so fragile that after less than a year of connecting and disconnecting the phone from the antenna, the circuit boards end up breaking up, ruining the cell phone.

I'm tired having to send my phone on warranty repair after six months and having to replace it every year. There must be a better way! Why not allow the use of extension mobile phones like we've had for landline phones for decades?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the practical, legitimate aspect of cloning for those requiring permanent connections to amplifiers and antennas because of poor signal?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been researching the subject for a long time and I have yet to see anyone talk about legitimate use of cloning for those of us who live in fringe areas where signal reception is poor and would like to have permanently wired &#8216;extensions&#8217; of one&#8217;s phone connected to amplifiers and antennas in order to simply get service!</p>
<p>What about using antenna adapters you may say? Fact of the matter is, phones are so fragile that after less than a year of connecting and disconnecting the phone from the antenna, the circuit boards end up breaking up, ruining the cell phone.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m tired having to send my phone on warranty repair after six months and having to replace it every year. There must be a better way! Why not allow the use of extension mobile phones like we&#8217;ve had for landline phones for decades?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2005/12/17/celphone-cloning/#comment-825</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 17:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2005/12/17/celphone-cloning/#comment-825</guid>
		<description>There's an update in the Globe and Mail today (Monday 12/19) - Ted Rogers himself called Ms. Hopper and told her the charges will be removed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s an update in the Globe and Mail today (Monday 12/19) - Ted Rogers himself called Ms. Hopper and told her the charges will be removed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
