<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Strategic Value of Legal Services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robhyndman.com/2005/12/16/the-strategic-value-of-legal-services/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2005/12/16/the-strategic-value-of-legal-services/</link>
	<description>any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:32:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Canton</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2005/12/16/the-strategic-value-of-legal-services/comment-page-1/#comment-815</link>
		<dc:creator>David Canton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 13:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2005/12/16/the-strategic-value-of-legal-services/#comment-815</guid>
		<description>I could not agree more.  One significant advantage of being former in-house counsel (as we both were) is that we realize that having a better understanding of the client&#039;s business allows us to give better legal advice.   

One of my pet peeves is getting comments on a document from a lawyer who has clearly approached it from a theoretical basis and has not taken the time to understand his client&#039;s business, or the deal.  Sometimes that is the client&#039;s fault for not communicating with the lawyer -  but the lawyer should take the time to ask the right questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could not agree more.  One significant advantage of being former in-house counsel (as we both were) is that we realize that having a better understanding of the client&#8217;s business allows us to give better legal advice.   </p>
<p>One of my pet peeves is getting comments on a document from a lawyer who has clearly approached it from a theoretical basis and has not taken the time to understand his client&#8217;s business, or the deal.  Sometimes that is the client&#8217;s fault for not communicating with the lawyer &#8211;  but the lawyer should take the time to ask the right questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

