<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Corporate Podcasting Guidelines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robhyndman.com/2005/11/09/corporate-podcasting-guidelines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2005/11/09/corporate-podcasting-guidelines/</link>
	<description>any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:33:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Inhouse Agent &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Morning musings</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2005/11/09/corporate-podcasting-guidelines/comment-page-1/#comment-655</link>
		<dc:creator>Inhouse Agent &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Morning musings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 13:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/?p=913#comment-655</guid>
		<description>[...] Read an article about &#8220;blogging-policies&#8221; that companies are setting up. I&#8217;ll need to take a look at what these entail. As Chauffer J just pointed out, if we implement one of those, it would just be another thing that one of us (I vote for him) would have to police. Who needs more work? That would just mean it would be even darker when we go to and from work. Anyway, I&#8217;m sure that we are covered for anything we need with our nondisclosure, computer, ethics and insider-trading policies. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read an article about &#8220;blogging-policies&#8221; that companies are setting up. I&#8217;ll need to take a look at what these entail. As Chauffer J just pointed out, if we implement one of those, it would just be another thing that one of us (I vote for him) would have to police. Who needs more work? That would just mean it would be even darker when we go to and from work. Anyway, I&#8217;m sure that we are covered for anything we need with our nondisclosure, computer, ethics and insider-trading policies. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: InhouseBlog - News for Inhouse Counsel</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2005/11/09/corporate-podcasting-guidelines/comment-page-1/#comment-648</link>
		<dc:creator>InhouseBlog - News for Inhouse Counsel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2005 02:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/?p=913#comment-648</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Corporate Podcasting Guidelines&lt;/strong&gt;

Just when you were finishing your corporate blogging policy, now you have to consider a corporate podcasting policy - as tech lawyer Rob Hyndman reports. Rob also provides a bevy of corporate blogging links that should be reviewed if you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Corporate Podcasting Guidelines</strong></p>
<p>Just when you were finishing your corporate blogging policy, now you have to consider a corporate podcasting policy &#8211; as tech lawyer Rob Hyndman reports. Rob also provides a bevy of corporate blogging links that should be reviewed if you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
