<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dutch to Create Cradle to Grave Records Database</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robhyndman.com/2005/09/15/dutch-to-create-cradle-to-grave-database/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2005/09/15/dutch-to-create-cradle-to-grave-database/</link>
	<description>any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 14:32:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Krajec</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2005/09/15/dutch-to-create-cradle-to-grave-database/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Krajec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/2005/09/15/dutch-to-create-cradle-to-grave-database/#comment-216</guid>
		<description>My first reaction is one of horror.  I cannot imagine having that much personal, private information in one location, especially one location where it could be breached, copied, and essentially be in the public domain.  Never mind the Big Brother argument.

It is one thing to keep a centralized paper record of everyone, but a completely different thing to do so electronically.

It seems to be commonly accepted that there is a need for instant access to medical records, but I wonder if there have been any studies that put a figure on the number of people adversely affected by the current method and would be helped by an instantly available record system.  From what I know, it seems to be only anecdotal and mostly hypothetical evidence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first reaction is one of horror.  I cannot imagine having that much personal, private information in one location, especially one location where it could be breached, copied, and essentially be in the public domain.  Never mind the Big Brother argument.</p>
<p>It is one thing to keep a centralized paper record of everyone, but a completely different thing to do so electronically.</p>
<p>It seems to be commonly accepted that there is a need for instant access to medical records, but I wonder if there have been any studies that put a figure on the number of people adversely affected by the current method and would be helped by an instantly available record system.  From what I know, it seems to be only anecdotal and mostly hypothetical evidence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

