<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Founders&#8217; Pie Calculator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.robhyndman.com/2005/08/26/the-founders-pie-calculator/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2005/08/26/the-founders-pie-calculator/</link>
	<description>any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:33:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David St Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2005/08/26/the-founders-pie-calculator/comment-page-1/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>David St Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 00:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/?p=780#comment-376</guid>
		<description>Having been one of the founders of an early real-time computer company, I think your Founder&#039;s Pie Calculator is right on the money.

We used a two tier system where the founders in the upper tier were allowed to put in more money and the founders in the lower tier were limited to about one third of that amount. This enabled us to begin full-time operation with 19 employees and carried us until we obtained outside financing.

The problem was that the president took an equal share with the rest of the top level founders and he should have had five to eight  times as much because of his contribution. As the company became successful, the inequities began to eat at him and his actions eventually destroyed the company.

A non-intuitive but equitable division of the shares per the Founder&#039;s Pie Calculator would have gone a long way toward alieviating this situation.

Frank Demmler is to be congratulated on taking a step in the right direction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having been one of the founders of an early real-time computer company, I think your Founder&#8217;s Pie Calculator is right on the money.</p>
<p>We used a two tier system where the founders in the upper tier were allowed to put in more money and the founders in the lower tier were limited to about one third of that amount. This enabled us to begin full-time operation with 19 employees and carried us until we obtained outside financing.</p>
<p>The problem was that the president took an equal share with the rest of the top level founders and he should have had five to eight  times as much because of his contribution. As the company became successful, the inequities began to eat at him and his actions eventually destroyed the company.</p>
<p>A non-intuitive but equitable division of the shares per the Founder&#8217;s Pie Calculator would have gone a long way toward alieviating this situation.</p>
<p>Frank Demmler is to be congratulated on taking a step in the right direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Business Opportunities Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.robhyndman.com/2005/08/26/the-founders-pie-calculator/comment-page-1/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>Business Opportunities Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robhyndman.com/?p=780#comment-246</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Founders&#8217; Pie Calculator&lt;/strong&gt;

	
	Frank Demmler:
Several weeks ago, we took a look at the foundersâ€™ pie. I noted that frequently the founding team divides 100% by the number of founders.
	I also cautioned that this is the WRONG WAY!
	I then went on to identify the factors that sho...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Founders&#8217; Pie Calculator</strong></p>
<p>	Frank Demmler:<br />
Several weeks ago, we took a look at the foundersâ€™ pie. I noted that frequently the founding team divides 100% by the number of founders.<br />
	I also cautioned that this is the WRONG WAY!<br />
	I then went on to identify the factors that sho&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
