Comments on: On Simplicity http://www.robhyndman.com/2005/05/03/on-simplicity/ any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced Thu, 02 Feb 2012 09:32:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Rob Hyndman http://www.robhyndman.com/2005/05/03/on-simplicity/comment-page-1/#comment-65 Rob Hyndman Thu, 05 May 2005 01:22:31 +0000 http://www.robhyndman.com/2005/05/03/on-simplicity/#comment-65 I suspect that it is both an innocent but misguided belief that we desire complexity and intensity, and a belief that bright flashy lights and loud noises = high ratings. On the latter point, the better view is probably that they are right, for most of the audience, anyway. And more's the pity. I want my PBS. I suspect that it is both an innocent but misguided belief that we desire complexity and intensity, and a belief that bright flashy lights and loud noises = high ratings. On the latter point, the better view is probably that they are right, for most of the audience, anyway. And more’s the pity.

I want my PBS.

]]> By: Tad http://www.robhyndman.com/2005/05/03/on-simplicity/comment-page-1/#comment-64 Tad Wed, 04 May 2005 03:54:17 +0000 http://www.robhyndman.com/2005/05/03/on-simplicity/#comment-64 Do these studies really suggest that the reason for the multi-media overload is simply an attempt at 'razzle dazzle' on the part of media outlets? Or, is the desire for a multi-formatted tv screen ala CNN Headline News part of a belief from CNN that we actually need, want, and can process all of that stuff? Or, better yet, is there something to pull from the conspiracy theory file that explains why providing information has to be something other than straightforward? Someone out there thinks we can receive and comprehend multiple feeds at once, despite the growing body of evidence to the contrary. (And, I'm not sure that 'simplicity' is the best word for what we need ... perhaps 'simpler delivery,' but the folks who note that in the end overloading equals dumbing down should consider that I want well-written and intelligent reporting that is delivered in interesting and creative ways and not simply 'simpler' news.) Do these studies really suggest that the reason for the multi-media overload is simply an attempt at ‘razzle dazzle’ on the part of media outlets? Or, is the desire for a multi-formatted tv screen ala CNN Headline News part of a belief from CNN that we actually need, want, and can process all of that stuff? Or, better yet, is there something to pull from the conspiracy theory file that explains why providing information has to be something other than straightforward? Someone out there thinks we can receive and comprehend multiple feeds at once, despite the growing body of evidence to the contrary. (And, I’m not sure that ‘simplicity’ is the best word for what we need … perhaps ‘simpler delivery,’ but the folks who note that in the end overloading equals dumbing down should consider that I want well-written and intelligent reporting that is delivered in interesting and creative ways and not simply ‘simpler’ news.)

]]>