Via IPKat, a English case in which a vendor of a business began working with the competition, and then in an effort to conceal his conduct:
In these proceedings LTE alleged that, once Thomas knew about the
disclosure order, he (i) deliberately evaded service of the order upon
him and (ii) installed a ‘scratch’ program on his home computer and
deleted various relevant files from the hard disk. LTE also complained
that Mrs Thomas (i) failed to deliver the computers immediately to the
supervising solicitor as required to do by the orders and (ii) failed
to provide her husband’s mobile phone number.
Thomas was convicted of contempt and imprisoned ….